×

or

Towards a safer work environment for women in India: The Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013

Towards a safer work environment for women in India: The Sexual Harassment of Women at the Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013

Sixteen long years after the Supreme Court of India recognized sexual harassment of women as a violation of human rights and laid down guidelines for its prevention and redressal at the workplace, the Government of India on 9th December, 2013 brought into effect The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act 2013” (‘Act’) making it the duty of every employer to provide a safe work environment for women.

As India treads the path of modernization, the number of women joining the workforce has increased steadily. In the industrial sector alone, women workforce has almost doubled in the last five years and the average percentage of economically-active women in the manufacturing sector is said to have grown by 35%, twice the rate for men, according to some statistics.

A survey conducted by an international non-governmental organization showed that as many as 17 percent of working women in India had experienced sexual harassment at the workplace at one time or the other. The Act was thus the urgent need of the hour, bringing within its ambit women who may be aggrieved of sexual harassmentat workplace whether employed or not both the organized and unorganized sectors. It also aims to create safe environment for women employed in adwelling place or a house. The new law, which is based on the landmark Supreme Court judgment, Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan [1997 JT (7) 384], mandates every employer to create a safe work environment and ensure that thissafe environment covers the interaction that a woman has with persons in the workplace. It duty binds the employer to formulate and disseminate an internal policy, organize workshops and awareness programmes for employees; provide assistance to the woman if she chooses to file a criminal complaint; initiate criminal action against the perpetrator and treat sexual harassment as misconduct under the service rules requiring strict action.

The Act defines “sexual harassment” to include any one or more of the following unwelcome acts or behaviour (whether directly or by implication):

  • physical contact and advances;
  • demand or request for sexual favours;
  • making sexually coloured remarks;
  • showing pornography; or
  • any other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.

It also lays out the followingcircumstances that may amount to sexual harassmentthough there may not be any sexual overtones :

  • implied or explicit promise of preferential treatment;
  • implied or explicit threat of detrimental treatment;
  • implied or explicit threat about present or future employment status;
  • interference with work or creating an intimidating or offensive or hostile work environment;
  • humiliating treatment likely to affect health or safety; or
  • interference with work or creating an intimidating or offensive or hostile work environment
PROCEDURE FOR COMPLAINT

Under the new legislation, an employer with 10 or more employees has to mandatorily constitute a four member “Internal Complaints Committee” [‘ICC”] that is headed by a senior woman employee. Half of ICC members must be women and in order to prevent the possibility of any undue pressure from seniors within the organization, the ICC must involve a third party, either from a non-governmental organization or a person familiar with the issue of sexual harassment.

Domestic workers as well as employees in organizations with less than 10 staff members will be able to access a Local Complaints Committee [“LCC”] set up by the appropriate government under the new law. An aggrieved employee can file a complaint before an ICC within three months from the date of the occurrence of the incident, Upon receipt of the complaint the ICC must hold an inquiry and dispose off the matter within 90 days. While the inquiry is pending, the ICC may recommend among interim measures the transfer of either the aggrieved woman or the respondent; or grant leave to the aggrieved woman for a period of three months.

Once the inquiry is complete and the ICC has submitted the employer with the report of its findings, the employer must take action against the concerned party.

PENALTY

An employer, who fails to constitute an ICC or contravenes or attempts or abets to contravene any of the provisions of the Act, will be liable to be punished with a fine of up to Rs. 50,000. If he has been previously convicted for contravening provisions of the Act and is convicted once again of the offence, the employer can be penalized with twice the punishment which may have been imposed at the first convictionor have his licence or registration cancelled. If there is a higher punishment prescribed by another statute, then the court will take due cognizance of the same while meting out punishment.

COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS

Companies need to take the following steps in order to be compliant with the new Act:

  • Draft and disseminate an internal policy on the ‘Prevention and Redressal of Sexual Harassment at the Workplace’ as per the Act and the guidelines laid down by the Vishakha judgment.
  • Constitute an Internal Complaints Committee for redressal as defined by the statute if the organization has more than 10 employees.
  • Carryout orientation programs for the ICC
  • Pass a Board Resolution stating the need for a sexual harassment policy and appointment of an Internal Complaints Committee.
  • Make employees aware of what constitutes sexual harassment and the redressal mechanism.
  • Prominently display on notice boards and other places within the office/factory information on helplines, penalties and the process that women should follow to complain about sexual harassment.

About Author

Shyamal Mukherjee

Shyamal Mukherjee is a Partner at Fox Mandal & Associates, based in Bangalore. At the Firm, with over two decades of experience, he advises clients on issues pertaining to Corporate & Business Laws, Corporate Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Employment Laws and has represented them in various courts and fora including Arbitration panels. Prior to joining the Firm, he has served the Indian Air Force as Assistant Chief Legal Advisor and also as Judge Advocate.