×

or

E-Commerce in India – Laws, Rules & Regulations in India

E-Commerce in India – Laws, Rules & Regulations in India

Over the past few years, global trade has expanded due to the explosive growth of electronic commerce. Simply put, Electronic Commerce is buying and selling of goods and or availing services over the internet. E-commerce is understood to mean the production, distribution, marketing, sale or delivery of goods and services by electronic means. The Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (“APEC”) defines e-commerce as all business activity conducted using a combination of electronic communication and information processing technology. The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (“UNESCAP”) defined ecommerce as “the process of using electronic methods and procedures to conduct all forms of business activity.”

LEGAL VALIDITY OF E-COMMERCE TRANSACTIONS

One of the basic questions relate to how electronic contracts can be formed, performed and enforced as parties paper documents with electronic equivalents.

FORMATION OF E-CONTRACT

E-contracts like all other contracts are governed by the basic principles governing contracts in India, i.e., the Indian Contracts Act, 1872 (“Contract Act”). The Information Technology Act, 2000 (“IT Act”) deals with contractual aspects of use of electronic records such as attribution, acknowledgement, time and place of dispatch and receipt.

  • Click Wrap Contracts: In case of a click wrap contract, the contracting party’s affirmative acceptance is take by means of checking on an “I accept” tab. Also there is typically a scroll box that allows the contracting party to view the terms and conditions.
  • Browse Wrap Contracts: A browse wrap contract is intended to be binding on the contracting party by mere use (or browse) of the website
  • Shrink Wrap Contracts: In case of shrink wrap contracts, the contracting party can read the terms and conditions of the agreement only after opening the box within which the product (commonly a license) is packed.
  • Unless expressly prohibited under any statute, e-contracts like click-wrap agreements would be enforceable and valid if the requirements of a valid contract as per the Indian Contract Act are fulfilled. Consequently the terms and conditions which are associated with an e-commerce platform are of utmost importance in determining and ensuring that e-commerce transactions meet with the requirements of a valid contract.

AUTHENTICATION

Though the internet eliminates the need for physical contact, it does not do away with the fact that any form of contract transaction would have to be authenticated. There are some issues that need to be considered by companies.

Digital Signatures as authentication tools: The IT Act stipulates that digital signatures should be used for the purposes of authenticating an electronic contract. The digital signature must follow the Public Key infrastructure (“PKI”).

CONTRACTS WITH MINOR

The very nature of e-commerce is that it is virtually impossible to check the age of anyone who is transacting online. This may pose problems and liabilities for ecommerce platforms. The position under Indian law is that a minor is not competent to enter into a contract and such a contract is not enforceable against the minor. The age of majority is 18 years in India.

STAMPING REQUIREMENTS

An instrument that is not appropriately stamped may not be admissible as evidence before a competent authority unless the requisite stamp duty and the prescribed penalty have been paid. In some instances criminal liability is associated with intentional evasion of stamp duty. However, the manner of paying stamp duty as contemplated under the stamp laws is applicable in case of physical documents and is not feasible in cases of e-contracts

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUES

One of the foremost considerations that any company intending to commence ecommerce activities should bear in mind is the protection of its intellectual property rights (“IP” or “IPR”) which is a challenge and a growing concern amongst most ebusinesses. Some of the significant issues that arise with respect to protecting IPRs in e-commerce are discussed hereunder:

  • Designing a Platform / Content Creation through a Third Party Often e-commerce companies outsource the job of designing such websites/ platforms or creation of content to third party contractors. The issue here would be who would own the IP in the design and functionality (software underlying the website) of the website and in the content.
  • Use of Third Party Content on Website Content could range from information to logos of third parties. In all of these instances the IP (such as copyright or trademarks) is owned by a third party and the e-commerce business necessarily has to obtain the requisite approvals. Similarly providing links to other websites is a concern that needs to be addressed as well.
  • Domain names Domain names normally fall within the purview of trademark law. A domain name registry will not register two identical domain names but can register a similar domain name. This leads to a situation where deceptively similar domain names can be registered.
ENFORCING IP – LIABILITY FOR INFRINGEMENT OF IP

Some of the most common forms of liability for infringement in India would be:

  • Injunction (temporary or permanent) against the infringer stipulating that the infringing activity shall not be continued.
  • Damages to the extent of lost profit or damages to remedy unjust enrichment of the infringing party.
  • Order for accounts of profits
  • Order for seizure and destruction of infringing articles.
  • In addition to the civil remedies, some of the IP laws contain stringent criminal provisions relating to offenses and penalties such as imprisonment of up to three years for applying for a false trademark, knowingly infringing a copyright and for applying for a false geographical indication.

CONTENT REGULATION

While traditionally there are several restrictions placed on the content of information that is distributed, the challenge lies in evolving similar parameters to regulate the content of information on the Internet. Some of the important statutes which deal with content regulation are as follows:

OBSCENITY ISSUES

In India, there are number of statutes that provide for regulation relating to obscenity:

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) Any material which is lascivious or appeals to the prurient interest or which may deprave and corrupt persons would be considered obscene and publicly exhibiting such obscene material (which may include posting on a website) would attract liability under Section 292 of the IPC. Any Act of making or publishing any imputation concerning a person with the knowledge or intention or the reason to believe that such imputation will ham the reputation of such person shall be punishable for the offence of Defamation under 499 of the IPC.
  • Indecent Representation of Women (Prohibition) Act, 1986 (IRWPA) An indecent representation of a woman which includes depiction of the figure of a woman, her form or body or any part which has the effect of being indecent, or derogatory to, or denigrating, women, or is likely to deprave, corrupt or injure the public morality or morals is punishable under the IRWPA.
  • Information Technology Act, 2002 (IT) Anyone who publishes or transmits or causes to be published or transmitted in an electronic form (a) any material which is lascivious or appeal to the prurient interest or which may deprave and corrupt persons; or (b) any material which contains sexually explicit act or conduct would be liable under the IT Act.
INTERMEDIARY LIABILITY

When an e-commerce website merely provides a platform and acts as an intermediary between different parties, the question that then arises is – what is the extent of liability of such e-commerce companies for acts of third parties? Section 79 of the IT Act provides for exemptions to the liability of intermediaries subject to fulfilment of certain requirements. Further section 81 of the IT Act provides that nothing contained in the IT Act will restrict any person from exercising the rights granted to them under the Copyright Act, and the Patents Act, 1970.

JURISDICTION ISSUES

In e-commerce transactions, if a business derives customers from a particular country as a result of their website, it may be required to defend any litigation that may result in that country. As a result, any content placed on an e-commerce platform should be reviewed for compliance with the laws of any jurisdiction where an organization wishes to market, promote or sell its products or services as it may run the risk of being sued in any jurisdiction where the goods are bought or where the services are availed of

  • IT Act: As per section 75 of the IT Act, the Act shall extend to whole of India and shall apply also to any contravention thereunder committed by person outside India by any person.
  • IPC: Section 3 of the IPC provides that any person who is liable, by any Indian law, to be tried for an offence committed beyond India shall be dealt with according to the provisions of the IPC for any act committed beyond India in the same manner as if such act had been committed within India.
  • International Jurisprudence: The US courts have developed the “minimum contacts” theory whereby the courts may exercise personal jurisdiction over persons who have sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state. These “minimum contacts” may consist of physical presence, financial gain, stream of commerce, and election of the appropriate court via contract.
  • In the case of Cybersell Inc v CyberSell Inc, the plaintiff, Cybersell AZ, was an Arizona corporation that provided Internet advertising and marketing services. The defendant, Cybersell FL, was a corporation run from Florida by a father and son team that offered web marketing and advertising consulting services. Cybersell FL did no advertising in Arizona, and had no offices, employees, or clients in the state. Cybersell AZ discovered the existence of the Cybersell FL, and informed them of the existence of their registered service mark. Cybersell AZ initially filed suit in the District Court of Arizona. Cybersell FL moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, and the courts granted their motion holding that the defendant’s web site was “essentially passive” and that it did not “deliberately” direct its efforts towards Arizona residents.

CONCLUSION

The rapid pace of growth of the ecommerce industry is not only indicative of the increasing receptiveness of the public but has also brought to the fore the issues that the legal system of the country has been faced with. The rapid pace of growth of the e-commerce industry is not only indicative of the increasing receptiveness of the public but has also brought to the fore the issues that the legal system of the country has been faced with.

About Author

Hiral Gohil

Hiral Gohil is currently working as Executive - Legal, Wockhardt Limited.