×

or

Environment Clearance Regime & Process in India

Environment Clearance Regime & Process in India

The Indian mechanism of environment protection regime and process has emerged as one of the best in the world, where a very fine balance between the need for growth and preservation of environment has been maintained.

BACKGROUND

With the economic development of the country and the rapid growth of population, there is an urgent need to increase our agricultural as well as industrial output, which more often than not, comes in direct conflict with the state of environment and environment protection legal regime in India. Today like any other country in the world, India is faced with the classic dilemma of making a choice between development and environment.

CONSTITUTIONAL & LEGAL PROVISIONS

The Directive Principles of State Policy of the Indian Constitution provide the State’s commitment to protect the environment. In the recent past the judiciary, especially the Supreme Court of India, has given recognition to concepts such as sustainable development, the precautionary principle, and polluter- pays principle. Also, the right to the environmental protection has been recognised as right to life as embodied in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

JURISDICTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION IN INDIA
  • CENTRAL GOVERNMENT Ministry of Environment & Forest-Regional Offices & Central Pollution Control Board& six Zonal Offices
  • STATE GOVERNMENT State Department of Environment-State Pollution Control Board / State Pollution Control Committee & Regional Offices
THE CONCEPT OF ENVIRONMENT IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)

EIA is an exercise to be carried out before any project or major activity is undertaken to ensure that it will not in any way harm the environment on a short term or long term basis. Any developmental endeavour requires not only the analysis of the need of such a project, the monetary costs and benefits involved but most important, it requires a consideration and detailed assessment of the effect of a proposed development on the environment. The environment impact process was introduced with the purpose of identifying /evaluating the potential beneficial and adverse impacts of development projects on the environment, taking into account environmental, social, cultural and aesthetic considerations. All of these considerations are critical to determine the viability of a project and to decide if a project should be granted environmental clearance. An EIA concentrate on problems, conflicts and natural resource constraints which might affect the viability of a project. It also predicts how the project could harm to people, their homeland, their livelihoods, and the other nearby developmental activities. After predicting potential impacts, the EIA identifies measures to minimize the impacts and suggests ways to improve the project viability.

THE STEPS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCEPROCESS:
  • The Project proponent (the organisation coming up with the project) identifies the location of proposed plant after ensuring compliance with existing siting guidelines. If project site does not agree with the siting guideline, the proponent has to identify other alternative site for the project
  • The project proponent then assesses if the proposed activity/project falls under the purview of environmental clearance. If it is mentioned in schedule of the notification, the proponent conducts an EIA study either directly or through a consultant. If the project falls in B category, the project goes to state government for clearance which further categorise into B1 and B2 projects. B2 projects doe not require preparation of EIA reports.
  • After the EIA report is ready, the investor approaches the concerned State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) and theState Forest Department (if the location involves use of forestland). The SPCB evaluates and assesses the quantity and quality of effluents likely to be generated by the proposed unit as well as the efficacy of the control measures proposed by the investor to meet the prescribed standards. If the SPCB is satisfied that the proposed unit will meet all the prescribed effluent and emissions standards, it issues consent to establish(popularly known as NOC), which is valid for 15 years.
  • The public hearing is a mandatory step in the process of environmental clearance for certain developmental projects. This provides a legal space for people of an area to come face-to-face with the project proponent and the government and express their concerns.
  • The process of public hearing is conducted prior to the issue of NOC from SPCB. The District Collector is the chairperson of the public hearing committee. Other members of the committee includes the official from the district development body, SPCB, Department of Environment and Forest, Taluka and Gram Panchayat representative, and senior citizen of the district, etc. The hearing committee hears the objections/suggestions from the public and after inserting certain clauses it is passed on to the next stage of approval (Ministry of Forest and Environment).

  • The project proponent submits an application for environmental clearance with the Ministry of Environment & Forest (MoEF) if it falls under Project A category or the state government if it falls under project B category. The application form is submitted with EIA report, EMP, details of public hearing and NOC granted by the state regulators.
  • Environmental Appraisal: The documents submitted by an investor are first scrutinised by a multi-disciplinary staff functioning in the Ministry of Environment and Forests who may also undertake site-visits wherever required, interact with the investors and hold consultations with experts on specific issues as and when necessary. After this preliminary scrutiny, the proposals are placed before specially constituted committees of experts whose composition is specified in the EIA Notification. Such committees, known as Environmental Appraisal Committees have been constituted for each sector such as River Valley, Industries, Mining etc. and these committees meet regularly to appraise the proposals received in the Ministry. In case of certain very special/controversial projects, which have aroused considerable public interest, the committee may also decide to arrange for public hearings on those projects to ensure public participation in developmental decisions. Announcements for such public hearing shall be made at least 30 days before through newspapers. On the basis of the exercise described in the foregoing paragraphs, the Appraisal Committees make their recommendations for approval or rejection of particular projects. The recommendations of the Committees are then processed inthe Ministry of Environment and Forests for approval or rejection.
  • Issues of clearance or rejection letter: When a project requires both environmental clearance as well as approval under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. Proposals for both are required to be given simultaneously to the concerned divisions of the ministry. The processing is done simultaneously for clearance/rejection, although separate letters may be issued. If the project does not involve diversion of forest land, the case is processed only for environmental clearance.
  • Once all the requisite documents and data from the project authorities are received and public hearings (where required) have been held, assessment and evaluation of the project from the environment angle is completed within 90 days and the decision of the ministry shall be conveyed within 30 days thereafter. The clearance granted shall be valid for a period offive years for commencements of the construction or operation of the project.

What do you think are the problem areas in the environment protection and regulation regime in India, especially in power sector?

There is a complete softness towards polluters both at the central as well as state level. There are two things here: regulatory regime and self regulatory regime. Industries have failed on the front of self regulation while the Central and State Pollution Control Boards established under the regulatory regime have proved to be toothless wonders. Further, there is a lot of political and bureaucratic interference in the activities of the Boards and therefore they do not behave like autonomous regulatory bodies. The whole situation is further aggravated by the acute resource crunch, both financial and human, faced by the Boards. Many Boards have to monitor more than 2 lakh industries with less than 20-30 officers. Our regulatory bodies are not able to enforce the laws effectively. I believe that unless the industries themselves take up control of pollution issue as the part of their corporate ethics practices, there can’t be much change in the scenario.

Very stringent regulations will hamper economic growth while a liberal regime will lead to rise in pollution, how to solve this dilemma?

We don’t have very strict regulation and therefore there is no question of our regulations being stringent. In India the rate of conviction of the offenders under the various Environment statutes is abysmally low. Under the “polluter pays principle” neither there has been any exemplary fine imposed so far on any offending industry nor there has been conviction and imprisonment of any offender under the various Environment statutes, which have all such provisions. Though I don’t believe that advanced countries have done much in curbing pollution, yet we find that there has been a higher degree of compliance by their industries towards the standards set for them, usually up to 60-80%, while in the Indian scenario the compliance level is as low as around 10%. Also at times we find in India that when a delinquent industry is prosecuted, there is much hue and cry and allegations are leveled alleging discrimination. The need of the hour is to have really strong Boards and address the enforcement problems, as we may have the most stringent laws but that still will not solve our problems if the enforcement mechanism is left, the way it is at present, weak and toothless.

MC Mehta
Noted Environmental Lawyer of India
A STUDY ON ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION CONCERNING THE POWER SECTOR:

Although electricity is a clean form of energy at the consumption stage, yet the process of generating electricity may involve depletion of natural resources, environmental pollution, displacement of population, health hazards, drastic changes in land use pattern, corrosion of structures, buildings and monuments, reduced yield of crops and loss of forests. The impact of power stations on the environment depends to a large extend on their locations with respect to waterbodies, agricultural and forest lands etc. Many adverse impacts of thermal powerplants can be offset by right technological control. Judicious siting, necessary control measures and effective environmental management of the operating plants also minimises adverse impact. The MoEF (Ministry of Environment and Forests) is the focal agency responsible for control of environmental pollution and environment conservation.

A policy framework and various legislative instruments guide energy generation and environment conservation. According to the National Conservation Strategy and Policy Statement on Environment and Development, (1992, MoEF) the following measures should be taken with regard to prevention and control of pollution and environmental hazards in energy generation and use, as also for encouraging an environmentally benign energy system:

  • Environmental impact assessment prior to investment decisions and site selection; choice of practicable clean technologies for energy production and processes and waste utilization, treatment and disposal of solid wastes, effluents and emissions;
  • Location of energy generation projects based on environmental considerations including pollution, displacement of people and loss of biodiversity;
  • Decentralize small projects for meeting rural energy needs and incentives for use of non-conventional energy sources;
  • Incentives and measures (including proper pricing) to prevent abuse and to promote the use of energy efficient devices in the production and distribution systems and forenergy conservation in all sectors including households, agriculture, industry, power and transportation;
  • Concerted efforts for development and propagation of non – conventional renewable energy generation systems, and;
  • Setting up of biogas plants based on cow dung, human excreta and vegetable wastes.
  • “The impact of power stations on the environment depends to a large extend on their locations with respect to waterbodies, agricultural and forest lands etc. Many adverse impacts of thermal powerplants can be offset by right technological control. Judicious siting, necessary control measures and effective environmental management of the operating plants also minimises adverse impact.”

SOME OF THE IMPORTANT LEGISLATIONS WHICH REGULATE A POWER PROJECT:
  • ENVIRONMENT (PROTECTION) ACT, 1986 AND RULES 1986
    Notifications issued under the Act
    • Coastal Regulation Zone Notification (1991)
    • Dhanu Taluka Notification (1991)
    • Doon Valley Notification (1989)
    • Revdanda Creek Notification (1989)
    • Disposal of Fly ash Notification (1999)
    • Taj Trapezium Notification (1998)
    • Ash Content Notification (1997)
    • The Environment Impact Assessment of Development Projects Notification,
    • (1994) and as amended in (1997)
  • WATER
    • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Rules 1975
    • Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Cess Act, 1977and Rules 1978
  • AIR
    Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981, Rules 1982 and Amendment, 1987
  • FORESTS AND WILDLIFE
    • Forests (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Rules 1981
    • Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972, Rules 1973
  • OTHER LEGISLATION
    • National Environment Appellate Authority Act
    • Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991
    • Factories Act 1948, Amendment, 1987
    • National Environment Tribunal Act, 1995
SUMMING UP

Despite the multiplicity of legislations and authorities associated with environment regulatory mechanism in India, this mechanism, within their limitations, have certainly put the environmental concerns at the top of the priority list. With the active judiciary and heightened awareness among masses regarding the environment issues the Indian mechanism has emerged as one of the best in the world where a very fine balance between the need for growth and preservation of environment has been maintained.

About Author

Nishant Srivastava

The author is a Researcher with Lex Witness and a 3rd Year Student at Campus Law Center, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, Delhi