×

or

Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel-Part II

Appointment of Key Managerial Personnel-Part II

The Companies Act, 2013 requires following too much compliance without serving any logical purpose. There are too many pluralities leading to confusions and multiple interpretations. Read on to know more in this concluding part of the article

Section 196 read with Section 197 and Schedule V of the Companies Act provide as under: 196.

  • No company shall appoint or employ at the same time a managing director and a manager.
  • No company shall appoint or reappoint any person as its managing director, whole-time director or manager for a term exceeding five years at a time: Provided that no re-appointment shall be made earlier than one year before the expiry of his term.
  • No company shall appoint or continue the employment of any person as managing director, whole-time director or manager who —
    • Is below the age of twenty-one years or has attained the age of seventy years:
      Provided that appointment of a person who has attained the age of seventy years may be made by passing a special resolution in which case the explanatory statement annexed to the notice for such motion shall indicate the justification for appointing such person;
    • Is an un-discharged insolvent or has at any time been adjudged as an insolvent;
    • Has at any time suspended payment to his creditors or makes, or has at any time made, a composition with them; or
    • Has at any time been convicted by a court of an offence and sentenced for a period of more than six months.
  • Subject to the provisions of section 197 and Schedule V, a managing director, whole-time director or manager shall be appointed and the terms and conditions of such appointment and remuneration payable be approved by the Board of Directors at a meeting which shall be subject to approval by a resolution at the next general meeting of the company and by the Central Government in case such appointment is at variance to the conditions specified in that Schedule:

    Provided that a notice convening Board or general meeting for considering such appointment shall include the terms and conditions of such appointment, remuneration payable and such other matters including interest, of a director or directors in such appointments, if any:

    Provided further that a return in the prescribed form shall be filed within sixty days of such appointment with the Registrar.

  • Subject to the provisions of this Act, where an appointment of a managing director, whole-time director or manager is not approved by the company at a general meeting, any act done by him before such approval shall not be deemed to be invalid.

    The whole section applies to filing of particulars of appointment of managing director under provision of section 196(4) of the act, and this provision is superfluous since the filing of the particulars of appointment of director and managing director is already covered under other sections. The period mentioned under other sections is 30 days, and under this provision it is 60 days. MCA must clarify the true position. Law maker should have left the period in the rules where Central Government can take remedial measures fast.

Overall maximum managerial remuneration and managerial remuneration in case of absence or inadequacy of profits. 197.
  • The total managerial remuneration payable by a public company, to its directors, including managing director and whole-time director, and its manager in respect of any financial year shall not exceed eleven per cent of the net profits of that company for that financial year computed in the manner laid down in section 198 except that the remuneration of the directors shall not be deducted from the gross profits:

    Provided that the company in general meeting may, with the approval of the Central Government, authorise the payment of remuneration exceeding eleven per cent of the net profits of the company, subject to the provisions of Schedule V:

    Provided further that, except with the approval of the company in general meeting,—

    • The remuneration payable to any one managing director; or whole-time director or manager shall not exceed five per cent of the net profits of the company and if there is more than one such director remuneration shall not exceed ten per cent of the net profits to all such directors and manager taken together;
    • The remuneration payable to directors who are neither managing directors nor whole-time directors shall not exceed,—
      • One per cent of the net profits of the company, if there is a managing or wholetime director or manager;
      • Three per cent of the net profits in any other case.
  • The percentages aforesaid shall be exclusive of any fees payable to directors under sub-section (5).
  • Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), but subject to the provisions of Schedule V, if, in any financial year, a company has no profits or its profits are inadequate, the company shall not pay to its directors, including any managing or whole-time director or manager, by way of remuneration any sum exclusive of any fees payable to directors under sub-section (5) hereunder except in accordance with the provisions of Schedule V and if it is not able to comply with such provisions, with the previous approval of the Central Government.
  • The remuneration payable to the directors of a company, including any managing or whole-time director or manager, shall be determined, in accordance with and subject to the provisions of this section, either by the articles of the company, or by a resolution or, if the articles so require, by a special resolution, passed by the company in general meeting and the remuneration payable to a director determined aforesaid shall be inclusive of the remuneration payable to him for the services rendered by him in any other capacity:

    Provided that any remuneration for services rendered by any such director in other capacity shall not be so included if—

    • The services rendered are of a professional nature; and
    • In the opinion of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee, if the company is covered under sub-section (1) of section 178, or the Board of Directors in other cases, the director possesses the requisite qualification for the practice of the profession.
  • A director may receive remuneration by way of fee for attending meetings of the Board or Committee thereof or for any other purpose whatsoever as may be decided by the Board:

    Provided that the amount of such fees shall not exceed the amount as may be prescribed:
    Provided further that different fees for different classes of companies and fees in respect of independent director may be such as may be prescribed.

  • A director or manager may be paid remuneration either by way of a monthly payment or at a specified percentage of the net profits of the company or partly by one way and partly by the other.
  • Notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of this Act but subject to the provisions of this section, an independent director shall not be entitled to any stock option and may receive remuneration by way of fees provided under sub-section (5), reimbursement of expenses for participation in the Board and other meetings and profit related commission as may be approved by the members.
  • The net profits for the purposes of this section shall be computed in the manner referred to in section 198.
  • If any director draws or receives, directly or indirectly, by way of remuneration any such sums in excess of the limit prescribed by this section or without the prior sanction of the Central Government, where it is required, he shall refund such sums to the company and until such sum is refunded, hold it in trust for the company.
  • The company shall not waive the recovery of any sum refundable to it under sub-section (9) unless permitted by the Central Government.
  • In cases where Schedule V is applicable on grounds of no profits or inadequate profits, any provision relating to the remuneration of any director which purports to increase or has the effect of increasing the amount thereof, whether the provision be contained in the company’s memorandum or articles, or in an agreement entered into by it, or in any resolution passed by the company in general meeting or its Board, shall not have any effect unless such increase is in accordance with the conditions specified in that Schedule and if such conditions are not being complied, the approval of the Central Government had been obtained.
  • Every listed company shall disclose in the Board’s report, the ratio of the remuneration of each director to the median employee’s remuneration and such other details as may be prescribed.
  • Where any insurance is taken by a company on behalf of its managing director, whole-time director, manager, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Company Secretary for indemnifying any of them against any liability in respect of any negligence, default, misfeasance, breach of duty or breach of trust for which they may be guilty in relation to the company, the premium paid on such insurance shall not be treated as part of the remuneration payable to any such personnel: Provided that if such person is proved to be guilty, the premium paid on such insurance shall be treated as part of the remuneration.
  • Subject to the provisions of this section, any director who is in receipt of any commission from the company and who is a managing or whole-time director of the company shall not be disqualified from receiving any remuneration or commission from any holding company or subsidiary company of such company subject to its disclosure by the company in the Board’s report.
  • If any person contravenes the provisions of this section, he shall be punishable with fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to five lakh rupees.

    It is not understood why Section 197 has been mentioned in form MR-1 since nowhere in the Section is any kind of filing of particulars with MCA involved. It is again a fishing exercise which is adopted by bad legislators.

    Rule 3 of the Companies (Appointment & Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 provides as under: 3. Filing of return of appointment. – A company shall file a return of appointment of a Managing Director, Whole Time Director or Manager, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) within sixty days of the appointment, with the Registrar in Form No. MR.1 along with such fee as may be specified for this purpose. The rule is very clear and there is no ambiguity.

CONCLUSION

Three forms are required to be filed in case of appointment of a Key Managerial Personnel on account of (a) passing of a resolution in form MGT-14, (b) filing of particulars in form DIR-12 and (c) a return of Key Managerial Personnel in form MR-1. All the three requirements can be clubbed in form DIR-12 by adding suitable columns. One hopes that MCA will simplify the new act without losing its soul.

About Author

Satish Kumar Batra

The author is B. A., LL. B., FCS, MICA and is a practising company secretary.