×

or

Integral Dimension of Law: Law and Psychology

Integral Dimension of Law: Law and Psychology

Law is a normative value to help society live in collectivity and harmony. For law to be a supreme regulator of all, it must become integral in theory and practice. An integral dimension of law helps State, society and legal systems to balance and harmonize competing claims arising out of complexity and heterogeneity of life and changing needs. Professor Dr. K. Parameswaran outlines his integral theory of law in this series of articles by showing how law must integrate knowledge from other disciplines; bring them under what law wants from them. “…Thus, when law becomes integral, it opens practical and yet unfailing solutions to assist peace, progress, prosperity and protection of all, for our current times and future age…” – author claims. Part I, explains the ‘integral dimension of law’ that exists between Law and Psychology.

LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY AND, LEGAL PSYCHOLOGY

Current legal studies in this background use an interdisciplinary approach under two categories; one, as law and psychology and the other, as legal psychology. Both fields of interdisciplinary knowledge have something in common and, unique and interesting. They both deal with human behavior; law as regulators of human behavior and, psychology as tools of knowledge to understand motive or cause of human behavior. Both have predominant interests on social relations and human relations; law that deals with relationships between people and persons arising out of legal obligations and, psychology that deals with relationships between people and persons arising out of socio-economiccultural relations, in any society.

Their prime concerns are practical applications and utilities; law that regulates as well as gives remedies through legal systems and, psychology that analyses as well as gives solutions through counseling and treatments. They both aim, believe and want to bring justice in life as a whole; law in socio-economic-cultural terms through equality, liberty and fraternity and the legal ascertainment of rights and obligations, psychology in terms of health and wellbeing through balance in mind-emotion-body complex and the psychological methods of arriving at harmony. Both law and psychology have conceptual foundations of value systems as well as empirical necessities for impact management. In short, a good lawyer can understand the psychological explanations on the nature of interrelations in social life and a good psychologist can understand the efficient ways of law-making directives and policies towards effective compliances.

Legal psychology is yet another subset of law and psychology. It researches– doctrinal, empirical and action-oriented values on the nature of certain legal questions, assistance to legal systems, legal institutions or on those who come into terms with law and its processes. It is done by those who have psychological understanding of social, cultural, economic, medical, scientific and forensic issues having implications on legal knowledge, systems and processes. Knowledge of various branches of psychology is applied on all kinds of elements and actors of law and legal systems. To put it in simple terms, it is psychology as a whole on ‘law in theory’ and ‘law in action’. Those who practice on this field of study–legal psychologists, are principally practitioners of psychology with or without legal knowledge and their findings on law are from psychological prism and scanner of understanding adding a flavor of psychology to law, legislature, legal interpretations and legal actions.

There are two ways by which this can be understood. One, a scientific and an objective investigation into the behavior of human nature and its body resulting in a visible or tangible conduct and the other, a psychological study to interrelate and map the cause and effect in any pattern of behavior leading to an outward conduct. This whole of psychological knowledge is largely mixed by physical or objective contexts as well as subjective or psychological frameworks. Yet, both constitute and contribute to one line of action or legally speaking a ‘conduct’ wherein the cause-effect relationship is seen with mind and emotion as a process of energy leading to physical and outward behavior of social conduct.

Former is the ‘animus’, an inner motivation or invisible energy behind and, the latter which is the ‘actus’, a physical act and conduct of commission or omission of doing or not-doing-things. Law and legal knowledge cannot afford to avoid this continuity of understanding or presentation from ‘animus to actus’ or ‘mind to conduct’. Soundness of mind, detecting a lie, motivation to commit offences, attitudes resulting in harm, process of memory and witness, sense of guilt, intelligence, capability, perception, foreseeability, intention to deviate from norm, ideas, thought, belief, cognition, faith, depression, punishment, rehabilitation, deterrence, morality, public policy, responsibility, trust, reason, logic, children, women, life, death, sex and any state of mind-emotion-body intricacies of behavior and their complexity etc., are some of the aspects that can largely be covered under legal psychology. Law and psychology overarches into policies and legal frameworks whereas legal psychology comes to rescue by certain empirical or verifiable findings.

LAW AND PSYCHOLOGY OF THE FUTURE

In a way, both law and psychology as well as legal psychology are of immense help to all the organs and functionaries of State as a whole in the implementation of laws through legal systems. State takes psychology into consideration while applying law through legal systems. However, State is able to understand and apply only to an extent a psychological knowledge appeals to those organs and functionaries of the State and legal systems. Be they legislative policy, executive action and judicial interpretation. The difficulty before the State, its Constitution and the Acts and Statutes in relation to adaptation and adoption of knowledge from psychology has to be seriously looked into.

Especially when there is no law or rule on what knowledge is and how knowledge is to be applied or from where a source of knowledge must be drawn in order to be included in the discipline of law. Hence we are compelled to see a mismanagement or avoidance or a selective inclusion of knowledge from psychology in law, which, without doubt is a reflection of a sad state of affairs as legal knowledge is waiting to be integrated from every department of knowledge.

One wonders; is it left to chance and circumstance for the organs and functionaries of State to make use of knowledge that lights from camps outside legal areas? This complex and unwarranted situation leads to a bigger question to be answered–what is legal knowledge and how it is to be construed and constructed? How much knowledge of psychology can be significantly used in construction of law and legal knowledge? What are the methods to connect and make these two disciplines collaborate in the development and functioning of law, legal knowledge and legal systems as both disciplines have something in common, unique and interesting as shown above? This can make State and the Constitution and the discipline of psychology to collaborate together, the functioning of tripartite organs and the psychological measurements of effective regulation of behavior and compliance to rules, as two ends of one common function finally resulting in justice for both social law and order and psychological well-being of the law of human nature. Interdisciplinary method of knowledge though useful and highly significant in making knowledge error-free, it has largely remained as two strands of knowledge coming from two distinct departments of knowledge without the required integration.

It needs a harmony for greater and deeper justice which integral dimension of law will fulfill through certain methods of integration of elements of understanding between both the disciplines. Why interdisciplinary knowledge of both law and psychology and legal psychology is half accomplished? What are the reasons and how are they to be addressed? Read the concluding part for understanding these issues from the view point of ‘Integral Dimension of Law: Law and Psychology’ in the next issue.

About Author

Dr. K. Parameswaran

Dr. K. Parameswaran, Associate Professor of Law, and has been Former Dean at Gujarat, National Law University (GNLU), Gandhinagar, taught at Symbiosis School of Law, Pune, NLSIU, Bangalore, NLU, Jodhpur, University of Madras, Indian Institute of Teacher Education (IITE), Gandhinagar, worked at Publication Department of Sri Aurobindo Ashram, Pondicherry. He authored ‘The Integral Dimensions of Law’ (LexisNexis).